U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Disparity in Dispositions - The Early Ideas and Applications of Guidelines (From Sentencing Reform - Guidance or Guidelines?, P 7-21, 1987, Martin Wasik and Ken Pease, eds. - See NCJ-103986)

NCJ Number
103987
Author(s)
L T Wilkins
Date Published
1987
Length
15 pages
Annotation
This paper traces the history of sentencing guidelines in the United States, noting the varieties and essential elements of guidelines.
Abstract
Although the theory of sentencing guidelines was first mentioned, but not adopted, in England in 1895, this was not related to guidelines development in the United States in the 1970's. Sentencing guidelines in the United States emerged from parole decisionmaking guidelines developed for the Federal Parole Commission, based upon the seriousness of the instant crime and recidivism probability. These guidelines were designed in collaboration with commission members, taking into account previous parole decisions. Sentencing guidelines have encountered difficulty, however, as some advocates have attempted to make them the province of legislatures rather than the courts. The courts' failure to develop guidelines on their own has not helped to counter this effort. Essential elements of sentencing guidelines are a distinction between policy and case elements, provision for the system to evolve, input from decisionmakers to set the base position and guide system maintenance and evolution, independence from current theories of crime and crime control, accountability based on principles and objectives, and the facilitation of research and the incorporation of its findings. 2 notes and 13 references.