U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Planning for Future Prison Needs

NCJ Number
104408
Journal
University of Illinois Law Review Volume: 1984 Issue: 2 Dated: (1984) Pages: 207-230
Author(s)
A Blumstein
Date Published
1984
Length
24 pages
Annotation
After reviewing factors that contribute to overcrowding in U.S. prisons, this article outlines methods for estimating future prison needs and controlling prison populations, followed by examples and suggestions for applying these methods.
Abstract
Factors contributing to prison overcrowding are diminished discretion in granting parole, demographic changes, and public opinion. Methods for anticipating and controlling prison populations involve population projections with and without policy changes and the development of policy that prevents the consequences of prison congestion. Some prison population estimation methods are to use the current population as a baseline, project future prison populations as a linear extrapolation of recent trends, and apply multivariate regression. Other methods use demographic-specific incarceration rates, disaggregated flow models, and microsimulation models. The estimation of a policy change on prison population involves characterizing the subset of court cases to which the policy applies, translating the policies into corresponding values of the policy variables in the projection models, formulating the behavioral model that characterizes the court's response to the sentencing policy, and calculating the projected change in prison population resulting from response to the changed policy. The estimation of policy impact is illustrated for a Pennsylvania mandatory minimum sentencing bill. The Minnesota sentencing guidelines system is presented as a means of incorporating prison population projections and policy impact estimates into the policy process. 39 footnotes, 3 tables, and 1 figure.