An examination of whether the drug tests constitute an illegal search and seizure, the nature of consent, and reasonableness focuses on whether the school's desire to limit drug use is sufficient to overcome an individual's right to bodily privacy. It is shown that reasonable suspicion is necessary for a search to be reasonable and that the burden of proof placed on the individual is an intrusion upon bodily privacy caused directly by the college's requiring testing as a condition of athletic participation. As this is an unconstitutional condition, the consent forms athletes sign are invalid and do not serve as an exception to the warrant requirement. For colleges to have a constitutional drug testing program, the program must require a search warrant and individualized suspicion before an athlete must submit to testing. 137 footnotes.