skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 104902 Find in a Library
Title: Punishing the Innocent - Unconstitutional Restrictions on Prison Marriage and Visitation
Journal: New York University Law Review  Volume:60  Issue:2  Dated:(May 1985)  Pages:275-303
Author(s): V L Hardwick
Date Published: 1985
Page Count: 29
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This note critically examines prison regulation of inmate marriages and visitation hours within the analytical framework provided by the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Procunier v. Martinez.
Abstract: In the Martinez position, the Court struck down California correctional regulations that placed restrictions on the personal correspondence of inmates. While the court noted the usual hands-off attitude of courts toward prison administration and avoided the issue of inmates' free speech rights, it held that an intermediate balancing test must be used in weighing the State interest in prison security and discipline against infringement of the first amendment rights of affected nonprisoners. It is argued that prison regulations that infringe on the fundamental rights of nonprisoners to marry the person of their choice and to visit with family members should not be permitted to stand unless the prison administration can demonstrate that these regulations are necessary to serve important State interests. The hands-off policy of the courts in the area prison administration does a disservice to inmates whose constitutional rights are violated. This disservice is compounded when a similar attitude is taken toward challenges to prison regulations that violate the constitutional rights of inmates' families. The recognition of these rights requires courts to abandon their hands-off policy and apply a more stringent standard of review. 182 footnotes.
Main Term(s): Families of inmates
Index Term(s): California; Corrections internal security; Inmate marriages; Inmate visits; Prisoner's rights; US Supreme Court decisions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=104902

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.