All data were obtained within the first month of treatment. Four therapists with at least 2 years of clinical experience evaluated clients in each group. Differences in judgment ratings between groups and correlational data on the therapists' and clients' judgments were determined. Patterns of endorsement of 10 specific anger-problem criteria by clients and therapists were analyzed in relation to their judgment ratings through zero-order correlations and stepwise multiple regression. Spouse batterers were similar to nonbatterers in consistently rating themselves as less dangerous and more motivated for treatment than did their therapists. The higher self-ratings and therapists' ratings of the batterers on problem severity and dangerousness as well as endorsement of problem criteria, in comparison to nonbatterers, apparently corresponds with the expected normative perspective of differences. The zero-order correlations and regression analyses also suggest differences in the basis of self-judgment between the two samples. 3 tables and 8 references. (Author abstract modified)