skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 109737 Find in a Library
Title: Youth and Risk: Age Differences in Risky Driving, Risk Perception, and Risk Utility
Journal: Alcohol Drugs and Driving  Volume:3  Issue:3-4  Dated:(July-December 1987)  Pages:13-29
Author(s): B A Jonah; N E Dawson
Date Published: 1987
Page Count: 17
Type: Survey
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Results from a 1986 Canadian national household survey (n=2,207) that examined differences between younger and older drivers on a number of measures of risky driving, risk perception, and risk utility indicate that risky driving does differ substantially as a function of age.
Abstract: Young drivers (16-24 years old) were more likely to engage in risky driving habits (e.g., following too closely and speeding), and they were more likely to have been involved in accidents and violations. Only the 21-24-year-olds were less likely to report seat belt use than the older drivers. Moreover, there was some indication that impaired driving was reported more frequently among the youngest age group (16-20 years old) Young drivers perceived less danger in a variety of driving situations (e.g., driving while impaired and unbelted in the front seat), and they perceived safety countermeasures to be less effective overall in reducing casualties. With respect to risk utility, young drivers placed less importance on safety features when buying a new car compared to older drivers, but the oldest drivers (50 and over) were least willing to pay for safety features. Intercorrelation of the risky behaviors revealed a moderate degree of consistency, but this consistency was greater among youth. Although there were no substantial differences in the predictors of risk-taking, it was apparently more predictable among young drivers. 17 tables and 27 references. (Author abstract modified)
Main Term(s): Reckless driving
Index Term(s): Age group comparisons; Canada
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=109737

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.