U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Screening for HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) Infection: Risks, Benefits, and the Burden of Proof

NCJ Number
109870
Journal
Law, Medicine, and Health Care Volume: 14 Issue: 5-6 Dated: (December 1986) Pages: 259-267
Author(s)
M J Barry; P D Cleary; H V Fineberg
Date Published
1986
Length
9 pages
Annotation
After reviewing the technical performance of HIV (human immunodeficiency virus)-antibody tests, this paper discusses how decisions about the use of these tests should be influenced by test performance.
Abstract
Currently, screening tests for HIV infection are designed to detect serum antibodies produced by the immune system in response to protein components of the virus. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISHA) is a test for HIV antibodies developed for large-scale screening of donated blood. The most commonly used confirmatory test is the Western blot assay. The sensitivity and specificity of a test are a function of the cutpoint for declaring the result positive or negative. The number of erroneous test results depends on the population tested, and this paper focuses on three hypothetical populations with low, high, and medium probability of HIV infection to illustrate the importance of the prevalence of disease in the population screened for determining test performance. When assessing the desirability of testing for HIV antibody, the paper recommends that decisionmakers consider the likelihood of correct and erroneous results and the consequences of labeling individuals as seropositive or negative in the use of test results. The burden of proof for establishing an HIV screening program should rest with those proposing it. 6 tables and 43 references.

Downloads

No download available

Availability