U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Improving Court Productivity: Two New Jersey Experiences

NCJ Number
109958
Author(s)
R Guynes; N Miller
Date Published
Unknown
Length
6 pages
Annotation
Hudson and Middlesex Counties in New Jersey have succeeded in relieving the enormous backlogs faced by their superior courts, using measures that other jurisdictions could apply to improve their court productivity.
Abstract
Innovations in Hudson County included establishing a screening process in a central judicial processing court to make most screening decisions within 24 hours of arrest and the use of a remand court to hear downgraded indictable cases originating in Jersey City and involving repeat offenders or multiple offenders. Middlesex County also created a central intake for all felony cases, but it gave the central intake responsibility to the presiding judge of the criminal division of the superior court. The presiding judge can make decisions on diversion, pleas, and sentencing because of immediate access to centralized probation office information. Probation staff are geographically assigned to all felony cases referred from a municipal court and are responsible for ensuring that information gathered from bail through sentencing reports is integrated and quickly available to the superior court. A study commissioned by the National Institute of Justice has shown that both counties significantly improved their court performance at no apparent cost to the quality of justice and with no significant negative impact on law enforcement or corrections. Figures and footnotes.