U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Prescriptive Relationship Levels for Juvenile Delinquents in a Psychotherapy Analog

NCJ Number
110187
Journal
Aggressive Behavior Volume: 10 Dated: (1984) Pages: 269-278
Author(s)
E Edelman; A P Goldstein
Date Published
1984
Length
10 pages
Annotation
A growing response to evidence suggesting the ineffectiveness of various treatment approaches with juvenile delinquents is a prescriptive intervention strategy.
Abstract
In this approach, an effort is made to tailor aspects of the therapist assigned to juvenile delinquents, the therapeutic relationship, and the treatment itself to an optimal match with receptivity characteristics of the delinquent clients involved. It has been proposed that productive psychotherapy with such clients must begin with the offering of an impersonal therapist-client relationship, one less threatening and more attractive to youngsters typically mistrustful of adults and reluctant to explore their own emotional functioning. This study examined this proposition in a factorial design crossing three levels of interviewer-offered empathy and genuineness with four types of delinquent adolescents grouped in terms of Warren's Interpersonal Maturity Level Category system. Four of the criteria typically used in research on the quality of initial psychotherapeutic relationships are: (1) subject liking for or attraction to the interviewer, (2) subject self-disclosure to the interviewer, (3) subject-stated willingness to attend a second interview, and (4) actual subject attendance or nonattendance at a second scheduled interview. With a few exceptions, study results indicated that across quality-of-relationship criteria, youngsters in the I-level categories reflective of mistrust, nonpsychological mindedness, and reluctance to explore feelings significantly more responsive to Low empathy-High genuineness interviewers than to interviewers communicating either High empathy-High genuineness or High empathy-Low genuineness. These results stand in support of a prescriptive view of psychotherapy, in general, and of the particular interviewer communication condition of the low empathy and high genuineness combination as an apparently utilitarian prescription for juvenile delinquents in particular. 2 tables and 62 references. (Author abstract modified)

Downloads

No download available

Availability