U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Keeping a Lid on Product Tampering

NCJ Number
110743
Journal
Security Management Volume: 32 Issue: 4 Dated: (April 1988) Pages: 83-85
Author(s)
L A Reinfeld
Date Published
1988
Length
3 pages
Annotation
This article describes steps food and drug companies can take to prevent product tampering.
Abstract
Types of incidents related to product tampering are actual tampering, faked tampering, copycat tampering, or threats to tamper. The first step in preventing product tampering is to appoint a small multidisciplinary team composed of managers with the authority and knowledge to make decisions. The team should plan for the worst-case scenario. A vulnerability study should be conducted of the company's products and tamper-resistant packaging features. Existing product withdrawal procedures should be reviewed and adapted to various tampering scenarios. A spokesperson should be designated in the event of a tampering incident, and all switchboard operators and consumer response representatives should be briefed on how to handle a tampering threat. Any person receiving a tampering threat should be thoroughly debriefed about the call. Some companies have installed automatic recording devices for storing incoming telephone calls. Procedures for handling mailed threats should take into account evidence-handling procedures. A company's approach to the tampering problem should reflect the company's priorities. For a packaged goods producer, the highest priority is likely to be public protection. This priority will affect the assessment of the seriousness of the tampering threat and the company's response to it. Company costs should be subordinate to safety priorities.