Such judgments can also be influenced when a decisionmaker justifies his or her decisions, according to recent empirical evidence. That influence is independent of voice considerations. In this paper, a study is presented that examines the effects of the opportunity for voice, a decisionmaker justification, and the sincerity with which the justification is given on people's judgments of procedural fairness. Based on data from a survey of 102 currently employed people, it was found that their judgments of procedural fairness were positively associated with the opportunity for voice, a decisionmaker justification, and decisionmaker sincerity. These findings are discussed in terms of their implications for procedural justice theory and research. 22 references and 2 tables. (Author abstract modified)