skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 112959 Find in a Library
Title: Victims' Rights Constitutional Amendment: A Bad Idea Whose Time Should Not Come
Journal: Wayne Law Review  Volume:34  Issue:1  Dated:(Fall 1987)  Pages:87-94
Author(s): J M Dolliver
Date Published: 1987
Page Count: 8
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: A victims' rights amendment to the U.S. Constitution has historical, functional, and legal deficiencies; there are reasonable alternative approaches to meeting crime victims' needs.
Abstract: By constitutionally emphasizing the conflict between the victim and the accused and placing the victim in the role of quasi-prosecutor or co-counsel, the victims' rights amendment would be a dangerous return to the private blood feud mentality. Functionally, a victims' rights amendment mandating victim participation in criminal justice processing could have negative psychological and economic effects on the victim. Such an amendment would be legally deficient because the Bill of Rights was designed to protect personal liberties from governmental infringement, not to protect private individuals from each other. No personal liberty of a victim is infringed upon by the government at any time during the criminal prosecution. There are workable alternatives to a constitutional amendment that can meet crime victims' needs. Mechanisms for action include Federal and State legislation, actions by criminal justice system agencies and personnel, and efforts by community agencies and the private sector. Model legislation proposed by the U.S. Justice Department addresses privileged victim-counselor communications, victim impact statements, open parole hearings, hearsay in preliminary hearings, victim and witness address confidentiality, statutes of limitation for offenses against children, bail reform, sentencing reform, and competency of child witnesses. Federal law encompasses the provision of victim compensation funds. 31 footnotes.
Main Term(s): Victim-witness legislation
Index Term(s): Victim reactions to the Criminal Justice System; Victims rights
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.