U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Effect of Executions Is Brutalization, Not Deterrence (From Challenging Capital Punishment: Legal and Social Science Approaches, P 49-89, 1988, Kenneth C Haas and James A Inciardi, eds. -- see NCJ-113635)

NCJ Number
113638
Author(s)
W J Bowers
Date Published
1988
Length
41 pages
Annotation
This review of relevant empirical studies indicates that capital punishment is more likely to promote violence (brutalization) than to decrease it (deterrence).
Abstract
In Gregg v. Georgia (1976), the U.S. Supreme Court held statistical attempts to evaluate the worth of the death penalty as a deterrent to crime inconclusive. Since the 'Gregg' decision, Ehrlich's deterrence findings have been discredited and even reversed. Careful review of other studies has revealed a balance of brutalization over deterrence results. Close examination of homicide data from earlier studies has shown consistent evidence of a brutalizing effect. Recent studies using monthly homicide data have provided more reliable statistical evidence of brutalization. Phillips' study, contrary to its original claims, should properly be counted among those studies finding statistically significant support for the brutalization hypothesis. 29 notes, 97 references.

Downloads

No download available

Availability