U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Criminal Law: Mentally Incompetent Criminal Defendants and the Substituted Judgment Doctrine: Commonwealth v. (versus) DelVerde, 398 Mass. (Massachusetts) 288, 496 N.E.2d 1357 (1986)

NCJ Number
115783
Journal
Suffolk University Law Review Volume: 21 Issue: 1 Dated: (Spring 1987) Pages: 308-316
Author(s)
M Diana
Date Published
1987
Length
9 pages
Annotation
This article critiques the court's decision in Commonwealth v. DelVerde, in which the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts considered whether the guardian of a mentally incompetent criminal defendant may invoke the substituted judgment doctrine to enter a guilty plea on the incompetent's behalf.
Abstract
The civil law doctrine of substituted judgment vindicates rights of the mentally incompetent, which otherwise might go unprotected, by enabling a court to ascertain an incompetent's preferences and accordingly to make a decision on behalf of the incompetent. In Commonwealth v. DelVerde, the court held that an admission of guilt offered through substituted judgment cannot provide the factual proof of criminal intent required for conviction. A mentally incompetent criminal defendant, reasoned the court, may not plead guilty in exchange for an agreed-upon sentencing recommendation. The court's decision was correct, because the acceptance of the guilty plea of a mentally incompetent criminal defendant through a guardian pursuant to the doctrine of substituted judgment, if the accused was incapable of forming the necessary intent to commit the crime, would circumvent the State's obligation to prove each element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. 48 footnotes.

Downloads

No download available

Availability