In four of the studies, youth were randomly assigned to restitution or traditional dispositions. On the whole results are quite encouraging. Youths in the restitution groups never had higher recidivism rates than those in probation or detention conditions. In two of four studies, juveniles in restitution clearly had fewer subsequent recontacts with the court during the 2- to 3-year followup. Comparison of restitution with traditional probation in Georgia showed clear and consistent effects favoring restitution. Similarly, in Washington D.C. restitution cases had fewer subsequent offenses than probation cases. In Idaho, results comparing restitution with detention were inconclusive. While the restitution group generally did better, the differences may have been produced by chance rather than being true program effects. In Oklahoma, no differences were found between sole sanction restitution, restitution and probation, or traditional probation groups. In Wisconsin, a formal restitution program was clearly superior to an informal program both in terms of successful completion and recidivism rates. 6 tables, figures, and 35 references. (Author abstract modified)