U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Exclusive Jurisdiction of the NLRB (National Labor Relations Board) as a Limitation on the Application of RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) to Labor Disputes

NCJ Number
117162
Journal
Kentucky Law Journal Volume: 76 Issue: 1 Dated: (1987-88) Pages: 201-236
Author(s)
J E Davis
Date Published
1988
Length
36 pages
Annotation
This article examines how to determine whether the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) or the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) apply in labor disputes.
Abstract
The NLRA mandates certain rights and duties pertaining to employees, employers, and labor organizations in the collective bargaining process and establishes remedies for the violations of such rights. The NLRA also established the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), a quasi-judicial administrative agency with the power to determine what conduct violates the NLRA and to provide an appropriate remedy. The NLRB's jurisdiction under the act is exclusive. In 1970, Congress enacted the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) to strengthen the hand of the Federal Government in combating organized crime. Although these two statutes are virtually independent of one another, certain conduct by employers or labor organizations may fall within the proscriptions of both the NLRA and RICO. Because the NLRA places unfair labor practices within the exclusive jurisdiction of the NLRB, the question arises as to whether Congress intended RICO to apply to such labor-management conflicts. Reconciliation of the two statutes requires ascertaining the type of injury the plaintiff has allegedly incurred and then focusing on the defendant's conduct to determine whether the NLRA or RICO provides the appropriate remedy. 259 footnotes.