U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Deposition Traps and Tactics (From The Litigation Manual, P 221-231, 1989, john G Koeltl, ed. -- See NCJ-117323)

NCJ Number
117335
Author(s)
T J McNamara; P T Sorensen
Date Published
1989
Length
11 pages
Annotation
This article instructs lawyers in how to use pretrial deposition transcripts at trial and how to counter the use of such transcripts by adversarial counsel.
Abstract
Federal Civil Rule 32(a) specifies the general circumstances under which a deposition may be used at trial. Impeachment of a witness's trial testimony with a prior inconsistent deposition statement is the most common. Rule 32(a)(1) also provides that a deposition may be used 'for any other purpose permitted by the Federal Rules of Evidence.' This rule vastly broadens the use of depositions as a substitute for live testimony. If the deposition testimony is either at odds with what a witness says on the stand or is the testimony of a party or his agent, it may be offered both for impeachment and as substantive evidence. A deposition of any witness may also be used as substantive evidence if the court finds that various specified circumstances prevent the deponent from presenting live testimony. After discussing pretrial strategy in the taking of depositions, the article concludes with advice on the art of using deposition testimony at trial.

Downloads

No download available

Availability