U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Judgments of Appropriate Punishments: The Effects of Question Type

NCJ Number
117384
Journal
Journal of Criminal Justice Volume: 17 Issue: 2 Dated: (1989) Pages: 75-85
Author(s)
A M Durham III
Date Published
1989
Length
11 pages
Annotation
Data gathered from two versions of a questionnaire randomly assigned to 276 undergraduate criminology students formed the basis for an analysis of the effects of open-ended versus close-ended questions on the punishment choices of survey respondents asked to select punishments for various offenses.
Abstract
Both questionnaire versions contained identical sets of 25 single-sentence descriptions of offenses. Of respondents 62 percent were given the close-ended questionnaire and 38 percent received the open-ended version. Respondents in both versions were asked to indicate the "Appropriate Social Response" for various offenses including violence, property, public order, and white collar crimes. A total of 6,900 judgments were obtained. Comparisons were made between responses to close-ended and open-ended questions both in terms of qualitative and quantitative dimensions of punishment. Analysis of the judgments confirmed that the method used to determine the public's preference of punishment for a crime has an impact on the response. The close-ended questionnaire version elicited a greater number of punishments than its open-ended counterpart. A greater proportion of respondents to the close-ended version selected incarceration and fines, while the open-ended respondents assigned longer prison sentences and selected a number of punishments beyond those specified in the close-ended version. However, the extent to which the two sets of responses represent substantive differences could not be determined. Tables and 11 references. (Author abstract modified).

Downloads

No download available

Availability