A valid social contract must recognize the value of the human person. The differences in Hobbes' and Locke's views of the social contract are discussed. Rousseau's wise legislator is contrasted with the governments envisioned by Hobbes and Locke. Kant's exploration of the relationship between politics and philosophy is outlined as is Rawls' concept of the need to tolerate many differing concepts of what is good. Rawls seeks a public standard for citizens to use in determining the justice of political and social institutions. Renewed interest in the social contract suggests a need for wisdom in political leaders. 25 footnotes.