Some States have authorized telling a criminal suspect who is in police custody and about to be interrogated that the suspect is entitled to a free lawyer "if and when you go to court." Some State and Federal courts found this language misleading, pointing out that a suspect could conclude that he or she is not entitled to a lawyer until going to court. Still other courts have held that the "if and when" language satisfies Miranda. In Duckworth v. Eagan, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the "if and when" language does satisfy Miranda.