U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Disputes Under Consideration by the U.N. Security Council or Regional Bodies (From International Court of Justice at a Crossroads, P 242-263, 1987, Lori Fisler Damrosch, ed. -- See NCJ-122854)

NCJ Number
122864
Author(s)
D E Acevedo
Date Published
1987
Length
22 pages
Annotation
This analysis of the role of the International Court of Justice in adjudicating disputes that are also under consideration by the United Nations Security Council or regional bodies like the Organization of American States concludes that the circumstances of the dispute rather than the fact that another body is considering it should determine whether the Court adjudicates it.
Abstract
Thus, subject matter of the Cuban missile crisis of 1962 would have been nonjusticiable even if the Soviet Union had accepted the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court. However, in the recent case involving Nicaragua and the United States, the Court did not accept the United States argument that the subject matter of the case was essentially one for the Security Council. Instead, the Court's pronouncement regarding the admissibility of Nicaragua's case makes it clear that the Court generally takes a broad view of what constitutes a judiciable dispute. Thus, a country that wants to prevent the Court from adjudicating cases involving armed conflicts should include these conflicts as exceptions to their declarations accepting the Court's compulsory jurisdiction. However, exceptions based solely on the view that the Security Council has primary jurisdiction are both undesirable and, in many cases, unworkable. 70 footnotes.