U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Corrections Law: The Fate of Prisoner Damages Actions After Will v. Michigan Department of State Police

NCJ Number
123665
Journal
Criminal Law Bulletin Volume: 26 Issue: 2 Dated: (March-April 1990) Pages: 167-171
Author(s)
D L Abney; L W Abney
Date Published
1990
Length
5 pages
Annotation
The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Will v. Michigan Department of State Police (1989) is likely to curtail inmates' ability to obtain judicial resolution, or even a judicial hearing, of their complaints against prison officials and prison systems.
Abstract
The plaintiff in that case was an employee who alleged that the Michigan Department of State Police and the Michigan Director of State Police, in his official capacity, had violated 42 U.S.C. 1983 when they denied the plaintiff a promotion for an improper reason. The Michigan Court of Appeals ultimately ruled that a State was not a person under 42 U.S.C. 1983. On certiorari, the U.S. Supreme Court held that neither a State nor a State official acting in an "official capacity" is a "person." The "Will" Court specifically stated that its holding would not apply to 42 U.S.C. 1983 injunctive actions against State officials; however, the Court did not discuss whether the general rule barring damage actions against State officials applied when the requested injunctive relief would have a major financial impact on the State. "Will" is likely to shift the weight of 42 U.S.C. 1983 damages litigation from the Federal courts to State courts. It is doubtful whether State courts will be as open to inmate litigation as Federal district courts have been. 11 footnotes.