U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Investigative Detentions; Stop and Frisk (From Contemporary Criminal Procedure, P 331-401, 1990, Larry E Holtz -- See NCJ-127813)

NCJ Number
127821
Author(s)
L E Holtz
Date Published
1990
Length
71 pages
Annotation
After an overview of search-and-seizure legal tenets applicable to police investigative detentions and stop-and-frisk searches, this chapter reviews significant relevant U.S. Supreme Court, Federal circuit court, and State court decisions.
Abstract
In Terry v. Ohio (1968), the U.S. Supreme Court addressed the circumstances under which a police officer may stop and question a suspect, without the suspect's consent, in the absence of probable cause for arrest. Under the "Terry" ruling, investigative stops or detentions may only be conducted when an officer has an objective reasonable suspicion, based on the officer's experience, that criminal activity may be underway or imminent. The protective frisk of a suspect's outer clothing may be conducted only when the officer has additional specific and articulable facts from which it can be reasonably inferred that the suspect is armed and presently dangerous. The frisk must be limited in scope and designed to discover only hidden weapons. The facts upon which such a search is based must be objective and not grounded in speculation or the officer's subjective feelings. The 23 court cases reviewed pertain to investigative detentions of persons, vehicles, and property.