U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Preserving Internal Validity in Correctional Evaluation Research: The Biased Assignment Design as an Alternative to Randomized Design

NCJ Number
127954
Journal
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice Volume: 6 Issue: 4 Dated: (December 1990) Pages: 216-225
Author(s)
K I Minor; D J Hartmann; S F Davis
Date Published
1990
Length
10 pages
Annotation
This paper demonstrates that the biased assignment design should be considered a viable option when random assignment is infeasible and when the investigator can obtain data on the criteria employed to assign offenders to groups.
Abstract
An overview of the biased assignment design is presented. If properly used, the biased assignment design will preserve internal validity and, unlike random design, will allow certain of the criteria deemed important by judges and correctional officials to guide the assignment of offenders to groups. The major feature of this design is the assignment to conditions on the basis of a cutoff on some quantified measurement. The four steps of using the biased assignment design are presented. Step one involves obtaining data on the criteria underlying the formation of comparison groups. Step two is where the distribution of scores on the pretest is inspected and an exact cutoff point for assignment to either the control or experimental group is established. Step three is the crucial step for preserving the internal validity of the evaluation. Each offender should be assigned a group membership solely on the basis of his or her ranking per the pretest cutoff value. Step four is program implementation. The article concludes with a consideration of the analysis of the pretest and posttest data. 5 notes and 21 references (Author abstract modified)