U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Decline of Habeas Corpus

NCJ Number
131456
Author(s)
G Hughes
Date Published
1990
Length
22 pages
Annotation
Following a historical review of how habeas corpus came to play its modern role as a postconviction procedure, this paper traces U.S. Supreme Court decisions that have undermined its current use.
Abstract
The undermining of the constitutional right of habeas corpus began in 1976 when the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Stone v. Powell expelled fourth amendment questions from the realm of habeas corpus. It continued in 1977 when Wainwright v. Sykes held that most constitutional rights may be inadvertently forfeited and only a few need be subjected to the more stringent standards that require a formal waiver. In 1989 habeas corpus was maimed by the holding in Teague v. Lane that the writ may only be used to declare or apply a "new" interpretation of a constitutional right if that right belongs to a very small group that has retroactive application. The overall outcome of this series of cases has been the withdrawal of the Federal courts from effective supervision of the national criminal justice systems. Table of cases

Downloads

No download available

Availability