U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Suspension of Inmate's Visiting Privileges Does Not Mandate Due Process Protection: Kentucky Department of Corrections V. Thompson, 109 S. Ct. 1904 (1989)

NCJ Number
131790
Journal
Washington University Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law Volume: 38 Dated: (Fall 1990) Pages: 259-273
Author(s)
R Simon
Date Published
1990
Length
15 pages
Annotation
In Kentucky Department of Corrections v. Thompson, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a Kentucky prison regulation did not limit official discretion enough to grant inmates a State-created liberty interest in visitation privileges.
Abstract
The Thompson case came about when prison officials suspended visitation privileges for two inmates at the Kentucky State Reformatory without affording them a hearing. The inmates brought a class action suit against the prison, alleging that the suspension of visiting privileges without a hearing violated the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment. The District Court for the western District of Kentucky held that the language of the consent decree entitled prisoners to a protected liberty interest in open visitation. The U.S. Supreme Court reversed this decision, holding that the Kentucky prison regulation did not sufficiently limit official discretion in order to give inmates a State-created liberty interest in receiving visitors. The high court explicitly endorsed the requirement of mandatory language for entitlement to due process protection. The case demonstrates the need to strike a balance between prisoner rights and the independence of prison officials. 89 footnotes

Downloads

No download available

Availability