U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Thirteen Indicators of Volatile Negotiations

NCJ Number
132565
Journal
Law and Order Volume: 39 Issue: 9 Dated: (September 1991) Pages: 135-139
Author(s)
T Strentz
Date Published
1991
Length
5 pages
Annotation
Hostage negotiators and police commanders on the scene of a hostage incident must be aware of early indicators that serious problems are developing. Thirteen criteria are suggested to measure the volatility of a situation and make tactical decisions.
Abstract
These criteria are based on analysis of several domestic and foreign hostage situations and relate to suicidality, volatility of the negotiations, relationships with others, cooperation and rapport, and the hostage-taker's life situation. The research shows that most hostage-takers are males and work alone. The four indicators that the subject is suicidal are the subject's setting a deadline for his or her own death, insistence on face-to-face negotiations, denial of thoughts of suicide, and verbal statements about the disposition of belongings. Two criteria indicating that the negotiations themselves are volatile are the presence of a weapon tied to the hostage-taker's body and the increasing aggressiveness of the hostage-taker during the negotiations. Further indicators that the situation is volatile are absence of rapport between the suspect and the negotiators, no clear demands or outrageous demands, alcohol or drug use during the siege, and multiple stressors in the suspect's life. The indicators are all equally significant. Table