U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Prospective Comparison of Four Insanity Defense Standards

NCJ Number
133146
Journal
American Journal of Psychiatry Volume: 148 Issue: 1 Dated: (January 1991) Pages: 21-27
Author(s)
R M Wettstein; E P Mulvey; R Rogers
Date Published
1991
Length
7 pages
Annotation
This study examined how different standards for determining insanity affect case outcome and disposition. Four forensic psychiatrists assessed whether 164 defendants met any or all of four insanity tests including the American Law Institute (ALI) cognitive criterion, the ALI volitional criterion, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) test, and the M'Naghten rule.
Abstract
The psychiatrists determined that over 97 percent of the defendants met the ALI volitional criterion, nearly 74 percent met the APA test, 70 percent met the M'Naghten rule, and nearly 70 percent met the ALI cognitive criterion. Nearly two-thirds of the sample met all 4 definitions of insanity, while 24.4 percent of the defendants met only the ALI volitional test; elimination of this test reduced the rate of psychiatrist recommendations of acquittal by the same 24.4 percent. These findings demonstrate that, while the divisions between cognitive and volitional standards are powerful, those between types of cognitive standards are not. 5 tables and 32 references