skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 134458 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Toneline Bite Mark Photography
Journal: Journal of Forensic Sciences  Volume:37  Issue:1  Dated:(January 1992)  Pages:195-207
Author(s): E Robinson; J Wentzel
Date Published: 1992
Page Count: 13
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 88-IJ-CX-0031
Type: Report (Technical)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: In bite mark analysis, the initial photograph is critical for the collection and presentation of evidence. A high-contrast film technique previously used primarily in the graphic arts field has been refined and applied to forensic odontology.
Abstract: In developing the technique, the investigation concentrated on looking for the optimum negatives to be enlarged onto lithographic film to achieve a black "pen-and-ink" line around the bite mark. The researchers also wanted to demonstrate the subjective qualities of currently accepted examination methods. The investigation involved 14 bite marks. Five were self-inflicted by a researcher because of a lack of timely coroner cases; nine were present on four decedents. The study produced 716 panchromatic film negatives (51 per bite mark), 463 orthographic film positives (33 per bite mark), 67 orthographic film negatives (5 per bite mark), and 23 toneline film positives (2 per bite mark). The toneline process reduced interpretational bias and yielded a transparent overlay with a photographic outline of the bite mark which could be directly compared with models of the suspect's teeth. It was determined that toneline photography is inexpensive and can be easily duplicated. The technique, however, has problems in that there is a loss of detail in shadows and it does not always work. 23 references. 2 tables, and 6 figures (Author abstract modified)
Main Term(s): Dental analysis
Index Term(s): Photographic analyses; Photography techniques; Victim identification
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.