U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Guilty Plea Discount: Rule of Law or Role of Chance?

NCJ Number
134783
Journal
Howard Journal of Criminal Justice Volume: 31 Issue: 1 Dated: (February 1992) Pages: 53-75
Author(s)
P Robertshaw; A Milne
Date Published
1992
Length
23 pages
Annotation
This British study examines differences in sentencing for defendants who plead guilty and those convicted at trial in 60 Crown Courts over 2 years.
Abstract
The study found that approximately one in eight Crown Courts in five circuits were awarding more custodial sentences to those pleading guilty than for those convicted at trial (reverse differential). Multiple regression analysis (MRA) of four administrative variables showed overall the not-guilty-plea rate was significant; for remanded defendants other administrative variables were relevant. Clearly, in terms of the MRA there were deviant localities from both positive-differential and reverse-differential courts. To examine this further, the analysis used descriptive statistics, which show that the MRA significance is produced by a minority of courts; the majority of positive-differential and reverse-differential courts have much in common administratively. An examination of the administrative characteristics of all these courts found a paradox; positive-differential and reverse-differential courts rarely share administrative characteristics, but they also vary greatly within each group. The study considered whether there are further advantages for defendants opting for trial in the reverse-differential courts in terms of their acquittal rates. On this evidence the study was unable to account fully for the two modes of criminal process found. 32 tables, 3 notes, and 4 references

Downloads

No download available

Availability