NCJ Number
134827
Journal
Temple Law Review Volume: 64 Issue: 1 Dated: (Spring 1991) Pages: 267-279
Date Published
1990
Length
13 pages
Annotation
The inventory exception to the fourth amendment's protection against unreasonable search and seizure is prompted by administrative and caretaking considerations, rather than by probable cause. However, in Commonwealth v. Nace, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended the inventory search exception to include police confiscation of a telephone number written on the cover of an address book found in the arrestee's wallet, thereby leaving the police authority to seize an arrestee's personal effects during an inventory search almost unlimited.
Abstract
Nace was different from other inventory search cases previously upheld by courts in that the phone number seized was not immediately identifiable evidence of criminal activity. By giving the police such broad investigatory powers as part of a routine inventory search, the court eliminated the general proscription against an investigatory pretext in the context of inventory searches. By stripping away the exception from its rationale, the court provides little guidance to lower courts analyzing inventory searches. Furthermore, the author criticizes the court for failing to provide sufficient analysis to uphold the admission of the telephone number; had the court evaluated the facts under a search incident to arrest analysis, the evidence could have been admitted without ignoring established precedent. 109 notes