U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Mothers' Prenatal Drug Use: Sufficient Grounds for Juvenile Court Jurisdiction

NCJ Number
134861
Journal
Journal of Juvenile Law Volume: 12 Dated: (1991) Pages: 116-119
Author(s)
C Lombardo
Date Published
1991
Length
4 pages
Annotation
California's Welfare and Institutions Code declares a neglected or abused child a dependent of the juvenile court, and a recurring issue has been whether an infant born under the influence of drugs qualifies as a neglected child under the code.
Abstract
In the case of Troy D., the child was born addicted to morphine, methamphetamine, and amphetamine due to his mother's use of these drugs during her pregnancy. Troy's mother contended that even if it was proven that Troy was born under the influence of dangerous drugs, this factor alone was legally insufficient for the juvenile court to exercise jurisdiction. In a related case, a Michigan Appellate Court decided the issue of whether a mother's prenatal drug use constitutes sufficient neglect for the court to exercise jurisdiction over Baby X. This court held that a newborn suffering drug withdrawal symptoms due to prenatal maternal drug addiction can properly be considered a neglected child within the jurisdiction of the probate court. The California court in Troy's case adopted the analogy of the Baby X decision, stating that prenatal drug use by a mother is probative of future child neglect and that care of a minor includes anticipatory actions. The Troy court distinguished prior case law in its assertion of jurisdiction to protect the child because it was protecting a living child and not a fetus which is not considered a child under California's Penal Code. 25 footnotes

Downloads

No download available

Availability