Both plans wisely endorsed gubernatorial appointment of judges, with legislative advice and consent. Unfortunately, however, both plans also called for a commission to recommend whether judges should be retained. Retention commissions should be avoided in any plan that is ultimately adopted because they create new problems rather than solve old ones. The North Carolina Supreme Court's chief justice has offered a better solution: gubernatorial appointment to a single, lengthy judicial term. He favors a long term of 15 to 25 years, after which a judge would retire and could not be reappointed. He believes elections are not necessary to create judicial accountability because the judicial branch is already accountable. Incompetent and unethical judges can be removed from office, and decisions that are unpopular enough can be changed by legislation or amendment. The chief justice's proposal has decided advantages. Long, single terms would promote judicial independence and avoid problems associated with partisan elections and other judicial selection methods. Alternatives to partisan judicial elections in other States are discussed including nonpartisan elections, commission selection, retention elections, and appointment. 339 footnotes