The public and the courts see each other quite differently, and both seem to lack understanding of the other. Courts are distinctive among the branches of government in the extent to which they are dependent on others for setting their agenda. However, courts are expected to continue their normal operations to satisfy public demands while still handling the sharp growth in drug-related cases. In addition, public debates of issues like the exclusionary rule and judicial salaries are conducted largely in a substantive vacuum, overlooking the role of the adversary system. Moreover, surveys have repeatedly revealed public ignorance about major aspects of the courts. Furthermore, media coverage through both entertainment and news coverage regularly expose the public to misrepresentation of the judicial process. Personal experiences also shape attitudes toward courts. To address these problems, court personnel must receive appropriate training and incentives regarding interacting with the public with respect. In addition, increased court interaction with the media, simplifying the language used, and many other measures would improve public attitudes toward the courts. Figure and 26 references