U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Prosecutor Immunity: The Impact of Burns v. Reed

NCJ Number
136384
Journal
Prosecutor Volume: 25 Issue: 3 Dated: (Winter 1992) Pages: 21-26,28-29
Author(s)
T M Davy
Date Published
1992
Length
8 pages
Annotation
In the 1991 case of Burns v. Reed, the United States Supreme Court ruled on a difficult question to the detriment of prosecutors by holding that the act of giving advice to the police does not entitle a prosecutor to absolute immunity from civil lawsuits for damages under Federal law.
Abstract
In the Burns case, the suspect was arrested for attempted murder and was detained in a psychiatric ward for 4 months, but the medical experts who examined her disagreed with the police diagnosis of multiple personality. The prosecutor gave legal advice to police officers regarding the use of hypnosis with a suspect and appeared before a judge to seek a search and arrest warrant. The district court found the prosecutor to be absolutely immune from lawsuits for these actions, and the Seventh Circuit upheld this decision. However, the Supreme Court reversed the decision in an opinion that will cause problems in any prosecutor's office that has ever been requested to give advice to the police. This decision will result in more litigation for prosecutors; therefore, they must think carefully when handling requests for advice.