U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Duty and Responsibility of the Identification Witness

NCJ Number
136823
Journal
Journal of Forensic Identification Volume: 42 Issue: 3 Dated: (May/June 1992) Pages: 197-204
Author(s)
L W Davidson
Date Published
1992
Length
8 pages
Annotation
This address examines the qualities and responsibilities of the expert identification witness, with attention to these aspects of the first identification expert used in court, i.e., the English bloodhound.
Abstract
The English bloodhound has the ability to track persons based on the presence of their scent at a crime scene. For bloodhound evidence to be admitted at trial, the dog must be shown to be pure-blooded, be specially trained to track human beings, be reliable based on previous tests, and have been free at all times during the trailing to have acted on his/her own volition. The circumstances and conditions existing at the time the dog was put upon the trail, as also those during the trailing, must also be shown. Like the bloodhound, an expert witness should and must be specially trained in the particular field regarding which testimony is to be offered. Just as the bloodhound does not know the person being trailed or have any other motive in his/her activity except to apply his/her training and ability to find the person with the scent being trailed, so the human expert witness should at all times adhere to the principle that testimony will be based only on the facts determined on the basis of specialized training, experience, and skill. Finally, the expert witness should be as free from interference or suggestion in identification conclusions as is required of the bloodhound.