An opinion pertinent to criminal justice involves proposed legislation to establish the National Indian Gaming Commission within the Department of the Interior to regulate gambling on Indian reservations. The legislation would give the commission the power, inter alia, to impose civil fines. This gives rise to several constitutional issues. The extent to which Congress may restrict the removal of subordinate executive officers such as the members of the Indian Gaming Commission is unclear, but such restrictions should be avoided. Also, consistent with the Appointments Clause, the authority to waive a Federal statute should be subject to the approval of a principal officer, such as the Secretary of the Interior. Under the Due Process Clause, civil penalties imposed by members of the Indian Gaming Commission should be imposed by an unbiased administrative judge rather than an interested official. Another opinion related to criminal justice involves the reappointment of United States Parole Commissioners. This opinion addresses whether or not the terms of the U.S. Parole Commissioners on duty as of November 1, 1987, will automatically be extended for a 5- year period without the necessity of new presidential appointments. The opinion holds that a statute that provides for the automatic extension of the term of a presidential appointee unconstitutionally interferes with the President's authority under the Appointments Clause.