skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 142377 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Eyewitness Responses to Leading and Misleading Questions under the Cognitive Interview
Journal: Journal of Police Science and Administration  Volume:14  Issue:1  Dated:(1986)  Pages:31-39
Author(s): R E Geiselman; R P Fisher; G Cohen; H Holland; L Surtes
Date Published: 1986
Page Count: 9
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: USDJ-83-IJ-CX-0025
Type: Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Three experiments were conducted to identify and develop interview methods based on current memory theory to enhance the completeness and accuracy of eyewitness reports in police investigations.
Abstract: The first experiment involved 42 undergraduate students recruited from introductory psychology classes at the University of California, Los Angeles. The students were not informed in advance that their memory of a staged incident would be tested. Instead, they volunteered to participate in an experiment to improve their memory. Cognitive interviews did not enhance leading or misleading question effects. The second experiment involved 39 undergraduate students, 20 in the cognitive interview condition and 19 in the standard interview condition. With leading information inserted, about 59 percent of the students reported correct information; with misleading information inserted, only 33 percent of the students recalled correct information. The purpose of the third experiment was to replciate the results of the first experiment using the methodology from the second experiment using 66 undergraduate students. Subjects who received cognitive interviews were significantly less affected by leading or misleading questions. In general, cognitive interviews did not increase the probability that subjects would report information inserted by the interviewer in previous questions, thus supporting the reliability and usefulness of the cognitive interview technique. 22 references and 3 tables
Main Term(s): Eyewitness testimony
Index Term(s): California; Criminal investigation; Witness credibility
Note: NIJ Reprint
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=142377

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.