U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

WHAT IS ACTION RESEARCH? (FROM PRISON SERVICE PSYCHOLOGY CONFERENCE: CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, P 267-272, 1991, SIMON BODDIS, ED.)

NCJ Number
143103
Author(s)
J Shapland
Date Published
1991
Length
6 pages
Annotation
After describing the features of "action research," this paper discusses its relevance to the British Prison Service, process and outcome measures, stages of an action research project, and some pitfalls in action research.
Abstract
"Action research" is involved in any evaluation of an initiative where the researcher also forms part of the team responsible for the initiative, or where the researcher actively seeks to guide and influence the initiative while it is underway. Action research is not currently characteristic of research in the prison system. Treatment projects would lend themselves to action research, when an initiative is intended to provide treatment of some kind to specific inmates, or to help staff in a particular situation. Other types of correctional projects suitable for action research are assessments or prison management initiatives. Often the "action" part of the research will be for the researcher to help the team that is implementing organizational change to develop its aims in such a way that they can be measured and the progress of the initiative monitored. The stages of an action research project are to define the initiative/project, to analyze the current environment before change occurs, to design the evaluation, to implement the project and the evaluation, and to complete the evaluation after the official termination of the project. The major pitfalls in action research are in the fourth and fifth stages: implementation and analysis/report writing. In the implementation stage, the danger is that the action researcher focuses so much on getting the project underway that the evaluation schedule is neglected. A pitfall at the analysis stage is that the researcher becomes so committed to the "success" of the project that objectivity is lost in the evaluation. 7 references