U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

DISCOVERY

NCJ Number
143697
Journal
American Criminal Law Review Volume: 30 Issue: 3 Dated: (Spring 1993) Pages: 1049-1078
Author(s)
C A O'Leary; K G LaPorte; J Schatz
Date Published
1993
Length
30 pages
Annotation
This article reviews Federal constitutional and statutory safeguards pertinent to the disclosure of all evidence in a case to the criminal defendant, as well as the disclosure requirement of Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b), as they relate to white collar criminal defendants.
Abstract
Although a criminal defendant has no express constitutional right to discovery, both the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. Congress have specified rights to disclosure for criminal defendants. In Brady v. Maryland, the U.S. Supreme Court recognized that access to certain specific information is essential to a defendant's right to due process and a fair trial. Other constitutional requirements of discovery pertain to materiality, specificity of discovery request, the scope of the Brady duty, impeachment evidence, the creation and preservation of evidence, and privileged or inaccessible information. The Jencks Act and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 26.2 (Rule 26.2) grant litigants in Federal criminal proceedings a general right to discover a witness' prior statements that may be useful for impeachment purposes. After indictment, a Federal defendant may conduct discovery under Rule 16. Under Rule 17, the use of subpoenas is available to both the defendant and the government. Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) requires that the prosecution notify the defense before trial of its intention to introduce any evidence of the defendant's prior bad acts. 242 footnotes

Downloads

No download available

Availability