U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

FUTURE OF FORENSIC SCIENCE (FROM POLICE TECHNOLOGY: ASIA PACIFIC POLICE TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, P 107-112, 1993, JULIA VERNON AND DES BERWICK, EDS. -- SEE NCJ-145004)

NCJ Number
145015
Author(s)
J Robertson
Date Published
1993
Length
6 pages
Annotation
The four primary issues that face forensic scientists in Australia involve organizational structures, independence, the legal system, and standards.
Abstract
Currently, no two states in Australia have an identical organizational structure for the forensic sciences, and it is unlikely that a unified approach, similar to the Home Office system in Great Britain, will emerge. This author suggests that forensic laboratories should seek to become affiliated with a local university in a symbiotic relationship where the university would receive rent and have access to scientific research while the laboratory would benefit from greater access to libraries, facilities, and equipment. The independence of forensic scientists from prosecutors' offices has been widely questioned in Australia; association with a university would provide a laboratory with independence and credibility to both sides of a case. While forensic scientists are often accused of making mistakes and submitting invalid evidence, other factors which contribute to court mistakes include complex and confusing laws, outmoded procedures, inadequate professional legal training, and an underfunded legal aid system. It seems that the Australian forensic field is moving toward accreditation, which will test each organization and its commitment to staff and standards.

Downloads

No download available

Availability