U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT - PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES BY DEFENDANTS AND THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE

NCJ Number
147986
Journal
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume: 83 Issue: 4 Dated: (Winter 1993) Pages: 920-943
Author(s)
M A Gemskie
Date Published
1993
Length
24 pages
Annotation
This Note examines the use and limitations of peremptory challenges.
Abstract
In Georgia v. McCollum, the United States Supreme Court held that a criminal defendant may not exercise a peremptory challenge in a racially discriminatory manner. This Note argues that the Court reasonably protected the equal protection rights of the juror to a greater extent than it protected the defendant's statutory right to exercise unfettered peremptory challenges. The Note agrees with the Court's reasoning, specifically the analysis of whether a defendant really is and should be considered a state actor; whether the state has standing to challenge a defendant's use of peremptory challenges; and whether a juror's constitutional right to equal protection should outweigh a defendant's statutory right to exercise peremptory challenges. Furthermore, this Note analyzes the implications of Georgia v. McCollum on future uses of peremptory challenges, particularly when a minority defendant challenges a nonminority juror. Footnotes

Downloads

No download available

Availability