U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Racial Differences in Perceived Sanction Threat: Static and Dynamic Hypotheses

NCJ Number
148470
Journal
Journal of Research on Crime and Delinquency Volume: 31 Issue: 2 Dated: (May 1994) Pages: 210-224
Author(s)
B S Blackwell; R H Grasmick; J K Cochran
Date Published
1994
Length
15 pages
Annotation
This study proposes and tests both static and dynamic hypotheses concerning racial differences in the perceived certainty and severity of sanction threats for theft, assault, and drunk driving.
Abstract
The study hypothesizes that there are racial differences in perceived sanction threats in that nonwhites perceive higher threats of legal sanctions but lower threats of informal sanctions than whites. The study also predicts changes over time in racial differences in perceived threats of shame, embarrassment, and legal sanctions. Data were obtained from surveys conducted in Oklahoma City in 1982 and 1992. The results confirm earlier findings that blacks perceive a higher threat of legal sanctions and a lower threat of informal sanctions, particularly the threat of self-imposed shame. However, blacks perceived higher certainties of both legal sanctions and shame in relation to drunk driving offenses. Overall, the data did not support the proposed dynamic hypotheses formulated by the authors. 3 tables and 21 references

Downloads

No download available

Availability