skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 
  NCJ Number: NCJ 150310     Find in a Library
  Title: Environmental Crime Prosecution: Results of a National Survey, Research in Brief
  Document URL: Text PDF 
  Corporate Author: American Prosecutors Research Institute
United States of America
  Date Published: 1994
  Page Count: 12
  Series: NIJ Research in Brief
  Annotation: A nationwide survey was conducted during the 1990-1992 period to assess the handling of environmental offenses by local prosecutors in large jurisdictions with a population of more than 250,000; survey questionnaires focused on differences in local environmental crime prosecution.
  Abstract: Of 32 States responding to the survey, the most responses were received from California, Florida, New York, New Jersey, and Texas. It was found that about half of prosecutors operated special environmental prosecution units. More than half assigned full-time prosecutors to environmental offense cases, and over 75 percent assigned part-time prosecutors to these cases. Most offices observed an increase in environmental offense cases over the survey period. The most common environmental offenses involved illegal hazardous waste disposal. The most important factors in deciding to prosecute environmental offenses were the degree of harm posed by the offense and the offender's criminal intent. The most significant factor in rejecting environmental offense prosecution concerned insufficient evidence or inability to recognize appropriate evidence. The least significant factor was lack of resources. Less than half of local prosecutors believed they could enroll in training to qualify as experts in environmental offense investigation and prosecution. Almost all indicated a need for increased technical assistance and training to improve the performance of environmental prosecution unit personnel. 3 exhibits
  Main Term(s): Courts
  Index Term(s): Prosecution ; Environmental offenses ; Illegal hazardous waste disposal ; Florida ; New Jersey ; New York ; Texas ; California
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America

US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
United States of America
  Grant Number: 91-IJ-CX-0024
  Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
  Type: Survey
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=150310

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.