U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Race and Gender in the Establishment of Juvenile Institutions: The Case of the South

NCJ Number
151182
Journal
Prison Journal Volume: 73 Issue: 2 Dated: (June 1994) Pages: 244-265
Author(s)
V D Young
Date Published
1994
Length
22 pages
Annotation
The role of race and gender in the historical development of juvenile correctional institutions is explored, with emphasis on the development of institutions for black and white and male and female juveniles in the southern United States.
Abstract
The decade of the 1890's marked a turning point in the history of gender and race relations in the United States. The literature suggests that the development of juvenile institutions in the South was precipitated by the need to control the different segments of society. Once the behavior of white male juvenile delinquents became intolerable, the pattern of placing them in institutions with adults was established. Controversy over this practice led to the mandating of separate institutions for white male youths and white male adults. Black male youths were controlled by slavery before the Civil War. After slavery ended, black youths remained in the adult penal system and were handled through the convict lease system. When these mechanisms became untenable, the juvenile institution was introduced to maintain social control, mainly by supplying needed laborers. Institutions for white female youths were developed to save poor white females from sexual immorality by providing a conduit for instruction in what was considered women's work. Black females were remanded to adult institutions or handled out of State until the costs necessitated the development of special institutions. Clearly, the advent of juvenile institutions in the south was intended toward maintaining the status quo regarding both gender and race. 36 references and list of official documents used as sources