In the current study, conducted to assess the influence of secondhand information on juror decisions, participants included 60 female and 40 male volunteers recruited from undergraduate psychology classes. They were randomly assigned to one of four possible conditions and were instructed to assume the role of a juror for the duration of the study. The stimulus case involved a defendant who was accused of murdering her abusive husband in self-defense. Four versions of the trial were presented, all of which included expert testimony called by the defense on battered woman syndrome. Results indicated that hearsay elements conveyed by an expert were perceived as less likely compared to a condition in which information was independently admitted at trial. Jurors, however, did not completely ignore hearsay. The impact of hearsay on verdict decisions operated primarily by influencing evaluations about the likelihood of hearsay events as opposed to judgments about expert testimony. 37 references and 2 tables