Media interference in the police operation at the recent siege in New South Wales have highlighted these issues. The media can change the outcome of terrorist incidents in four ways: (1) by contributing to disorder and crowd control problems as terrorists play to the camera, (2) by trying to communicate directly with terrorists and thereby upsetting the negotiation process, (3) by disclosing tactical information to terrorists, and (4) by raising public anxiety and thereby increasing pressure for a resolution. In addition, publicity tends to inspire copycat incidents. Moreover, some victims welcome media interest, while others find media attention unbearable. The relationship between the authorities and the media works best when all work together while understanding their distinct roles. Police should recognize that the media are interested in terrorist incidents, while the media should avoid taking any independent or unauthorized action which could further endanger lives of hostages. The media should avoid becoming part of the story or giving terrorists an unedited propaganda platform. 7 references