U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Divorcing Parents Are Often Unfairly Accused of Child Sexual Abuse (From Child Abuse: Opposing Viewpoints, P 48-55, 1994, David Bender and Bruno Leone, eds. -- See NCJ-159823)

NCJ Number
159828
Author(s)
R Sheridan
Date Published
1994
Length
8 pages
Annotation
False child abuse accusations have become a weapon of choice in the angry conflict accompanying many divorces, and the emotionalism caused by child abuse allegations often prohibits a rational examination of the facts.
Abstract
The result is that many parents, usually fathers, are unjustly branded as child abusers and deprived of contact with their children. Child abuse cases are peculiarly difficult for authorities to deal with rationally for several reasons. Underlying causes of difficulty involve the emotions such cases engender, along with the pressure to "do something" right away to protect children from abuse. In child abuse cases, the amount of proof required to remove a child temporarily from a parent is minimal; the mere reported statement of a child is often sufficient, especially when the reporting party is a person in authority. The rational approach requires that no adverse action be taken without sufficient proof and that reasonable objections be shown not to exist before adverse action can justifiably be taken. Mental abnormality is discussed as an explanatory factor in child abuse allegations in the divorce context, and the importance of consistency and accuracy in listening to and evaluating child abuse allegations is stressed.

Downloads

No download available

Availability