The analysis revealed that PreStart was developed in a turbulent policy environment, that the reform resulted from long-standing dissatisfaction with existing parole structures, and that a severe budget crisis determined the timing of PreStart's initiation. Pragmatic financial and organizational concerns drove much of the process that resulted in the program, but it also reflects changing correctional philosophies in the IDOC. The abbreviated planning process and funding limitations seriously harmed staff morale. The short period for program development made it difficult to identify and accommodate implementation contingencies that were likely to develop. As a result, the program was formulated without having widespread acceptance among groups that could shape its eventual implementation. System and facility factors as well as inadequate resources resulted in an uneven level of implementation across facilities. Implementation at community correctional centers was generally much weaker than at correctional institutions. Inmate reactions to the program vary across facilities but have generally been positive. Numerous measures are recommended to improve PreStart programming. 56 references