U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Conflict Between Clinical and Evidential Interviewing in Child Sexual Abuse

NCJ Number
164463
Journal
Psychology, Crime & Law Volume: 1 Issue: 2 Dated: (1994) Pages: 181-186
Author(s)
H R Dent; S Newton
Date Published
1994
Length
6 pages
Annotation
This paper looks at procedures for clinical and evidential interviewing of child victim witnesses, with particular emphasis on how demands of evidential interviewing may deny some victims protection under the law.
Abstract
Research and clinical experience indicate that a substantial number of sexually abused children are told by the perpetrator not to tell and that children do not divulge secrets lightly. The legal field, however, has not yet developed a strategy to help children disclose sexual abuse incidents, and strategies developed by clinicians tend to render evidence either inadmissible or at least vulnerable to being discredited by cross-examination. When interviewing children who may have been sexually abused, it is essential to understand child development in general and cognitive and linguistic development in particular. Differences between clinical and evidential interviewing methods are noted, along with specific types of information that should be obtained by social workers and police officers when child sexual abuse may have occurred. Additional research is recommended to identify ways of helping children disclose sexual abuse incidents. 25 references